I can't read/ understand the last part of the question…
Tu trouves qu'il y a des passerelles entre ce que fait Kirby dans les années 70 et ce qui se pratiquait alors [c-à-d à la fin des 60's et dans les 70's], dans les "beaux-arts" ?!?? Entre Kirby et l'art classique, c'est évident ! ; entre Kirby et la peinture américaine abstraite des années 40 et 50, c'est fort concevable ; mais après (fluxus, art minimaliste, support-surface, art conceptuel, etc.)… ça me dépasse…
I was thinking more of Pop Art and Lichtenstein, specifically. See here--http://jordanmartins.wordpress.com/2011/08/23/214/--where this guy summarizes a talk I gave last year (without naming me!). I will write it up as an article soon...
The first and most comprehensive source of abstract comics on the web, tracing the history and surveying the contemporary landscape of abstract sequential art.
On Abstract Comics: The Anthology (Currently SOLD OUT):
The artists assembled by Andrei Molotiu for his anthology ABSTRACT COMICS (Fantagraphics, $39.99) push “cartooning” to its limits... It’s a fascinating book to stare at, and as with other kinds of abstract art, half the fun is observing your own reactions: anyone who’s used to reading more conventional sorts of comics is likely to reflexively impose narrative on these abstractions, to figure out just what each panel has to do with the next.
--Douglas Wolk, New York Times Book Review, Holiday Books edition, December 6, 2009 The collection has a wealth of rewarding material... it is a significant historical document that may jump-start an actual new genre.
--Doug Harvey, LA Weekly It becomes a treat to take a page of art - or a simple panel - and consider how the shapes, texture, depth, and color interact with one another; to reflect on how, when one takes the time, the enjoyment one ordinarily finds in reading a purely textually-oriented, narrative-driven written story can - with the graphic form - be translated into something completely different.
--Adam Waterreus, Politics and Prose, "Favorite Graphic Literature of the Year."
...this arresting book is like a scoop of primordial narrative, representational mud. Which is to say, it has vitaminic powers.
--Design Observer
For years, comics (at least American ones) have doggedly refused for one reason or another, to consider other schools of art and beyond mere representation. It's only now we see artists attempting to branch out and try to push at the edge's of the medium's definition. As such I found Abstract Comics to be a revealing, thought-provoking and genuinely lovely book that I'll be sure to be rereading in the months to come.
Kirby ?
ReplyDelete(Do you know this excellent blog on XIXth's comic strips : http://topfferiana.free.fr/ ? And this webrevue, always, about XIXth's comics ?)
Sorry, I forgot the webrevue link… : http://www.coconino.fr/graphic_post/index.html
ReplyDeleteYup, Kirby. From a late FF and from New Gods 6. If you download the full image you might even be able to read the question...
ReplyDeleteI can't read/ understand the last part of the question…
ReplyDeleteTu trouves qu'il y a des passerelles entre ce que fait Kirby dans les années 70 et ce qui se pratiquait alors [c-à-d à la fin des 60's et dans les 70's], dans les "beaux-arts" ?!?? Entre Kirby et l'art classique, c'est évident ! ; entre Kirby et la peinture américaine abstraite des années 40 et 50, c'est fort concevable ; mais après (fluxus, art minimaliste, support-surface, art conceptuel, etc.)… ça me dépasse…
I was thinking more of Pop Art and Lichtenstein, specifically. See here--http://jordanmartins.wordpress.com/2011/08/23/214/--where this guy summarizes a talk I gave last year (without naming me!). I will write it up as an article soon...
ReplyDelete